Open Preview
See a Problem?
We'd love your help. Permit u.s. know what's wrong with this preview of Domination and the Arts of Resistance past James C. Scott.
Thanks for telling united states of america about the trouble.
To see what your friends thought of this volume, please sign upwardly.
Be the start to ask a question about Domination and the Arts of Resistance
· 586 ratings · 45 reviews
Start your review of Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Subconscious Transcripts
This is a classic - or should be anyway. One of the few books that even in graduate school when I had no time I couldn't assist but read slowly, every word, embrace-to-comprehend. It's beautifully written, and better, I think, than Weapons of the Weak - well, this is really taking off above all else from that volume's first chapter. He starts off with the question "What does it hateful to speak truth to power?" Particularly when we all agree now that it's not there is simply ane truth in the world actually. Even so at c This is a classic - or should be anyway. One of the few books that even in graduate schoolhouse when I had no fourth dimension I couldn't help but read slowly, every word, cover-to-encompass. It's beautifully written, and better, I think, than Weapons of the Weak - well, this is really taking off to a higher place all else from that book'due south first chapter. He starts off with the question "What does it hateful to speak truth to power?" Peculiarly when we all concord now that information technology's not there is only one truth in the world actually. Yet at certain moments - when a tenant farmer'due south wife tells off the landlord, when someone says what they really think virtually Pinochet in Republic of chile and isn't taken away - that everyone feels someone has spoken for anybody. Why? Scott suggests a big part of the reason is that under conditions of extreme oppression, pretty much anybody is going effectually making little speeches in their head that they'd really like to say simply don't cartel too, not realizing that everyone else is doing information technology too, and that the speeches are all almost exactly the same. One reason for that, in turn, is that extreme inequalities of ability always create a world of make-believe, an official line that everyone feels they must merits to take in public ("actually, slave owners have a paternal business for their slaves' well-existence", that sort of thing) that nobody believes - not the slaves, non the owners; not the peasants, not the lords - just which the higher-ups insist no ane claiming as a test of ability itself, rather like holding a gun to people's heads and insisting that they tell you lot that 2+2=5. As a issue, information technology's about as if anybody is collaborating to falsify the historical record, because if you look at the documents that remain to us from say, feudal Europe or aboriginal China (etc etc), what you'll become is probably the official line that no i at the fourth dimension took seriously behind closed doors at all.Pocket-size criticisms: the phrases "public" and "subconscious transcript" - while useful to brand the point nearly history - are not well called otherwise. Also, Scott could take been more insistent about making clear this is not a theory of power, but a theory of what happens in cases of extreme and explicit inequality betwixt conspicuously demarcated groups (the experience of peasants, slaves, serfs, untouchables, victims of overt racism, etc...) This might seem unfair as Scott does say this in the introduction, and has come under a lot of quite unfair criticism anyway (Susan Gal's review essay in Cultural ANthropology comes to heed) by people who charge him of writing an inadequate theory of power in general - pretending they haven't read the into where he explicitly says that he is not writing a theory of power at all - but at times, some chapters can be read this way, and it might have been helpful to keep hammering home the point. Though information technology's so ridiculous we academics should have to spotter our ass this way confronting means we're likely to exist misinterpreted.
...more 
This is a superb book: Scott sets out and for the most part successfully outlines the role of what he calls the hidden transcripts of domination in cultural and political life. His basic supposition is that all systems of domination include a means of resistance – the 'backstage talk' of the oppressed and the subaltern – that the dominant suspect might be simply cannot in whatsoever way go access to. My simply existent concern is that he tends to crudely characterise the Gramscian notion of hegemony as simpl
This is a superb book: Scott sets out and for the most part successfully outlines the part of what he calls the hidden transcripts of domination in cultural and political life. His basic supposition is that all systems of domination include a means of resistance – the 'backstage talk' of the oppressed and the subaltern – that the dominant suspect might exist simply cannot in whatsoever mode go access to. My only existent concern is that he tends to crudely characterise the Gramscian notion of hegemony every bit simple acceptance of that dominance when in many means information technology seems to me that what he is outlining is the operation of what Gramsci refers to every bit a war of position – the constant shifting struggle of domination and resistance where 1 group – the oppressed, the dominant – make advances in one surface area of life only to lose a fiddling power or advantage in another, equally opposed to what Gramsci as well calls the war of motility – straight confrontation.
Scott's major contribution is, I think, 2-fold: he shows the means in which the hidden transcripts work in similar ways in different settings, and he proposes a relationship between the wars of position and move – the ways the subconscious transcript becomes public and serves as a rallying cry. He draws on a broad range of evidence – US slave narratives, historical analyses of medieval French republic, anti-state action in Soviet-era eastern bloc states – to build a compelling argument that we analysts of cultural politics, of social movements, and of everyday life ignore at our peril. Essential reading.
...more than 
This book is a great read because it is written past a political scientist who is using anthropological tools to reinterpret history. A lot of James C Scott's inquiry covers what he calls infrapolitics of the subaltern groups and the way they have historically exercised their agency. This book is perhaps the key piece of work in this regard.A large portion of this volume features a solid analysis of domination, oppression, and bureau which is distinct from the other mainstream concepts of power (Marx, Fouc
This volume is a great read considering information technology is written by a political scientist who is using anthropological tools to reinterpret history. A lot of James C Scott's enquiry covers what he calls infrapolitics of the subaltern groups and the fashion they have historically exercised their agency. This book is perhaps the central piece of work in this regard.A large portion of this book features a solid analysis of domination, oppression, and bureau which is singled-out from the other mainstream concepts of power (Marx, Foucault, Bourdieu etc.). Scott shows the difference between the public transcript determined by the dominant groups and the 'hidden transcript' of the subordinate groups - peasants, lower castes, slaves, serfs - which is rich and detailed. He besides critiques the theory of false consciousness which, according to him, is simplistic and denies the agency of subordinated groups. He then demonstrates through countless examples how the hidden transcript can be traced in pop civilisation, revolts, carnivals, festivals, folk stories etc. Additionally, he shows the ways in which the subjugated make skillful use of the public transcript and dominant group's own beliefs against them.
Scott's assay is much more hopeful and empowering in that it offers a perspective on history that appreciates the consistent struggle the subaltern has waged against their subjugation. They accept non been passive or ignorant receivers of oppression as imagined past other, more mainstream, theoreticians of power. This book is a must-read if you desire to sympathise class conflict and the politics of resistance in general. Information technology makes for an interesting read as a result of the fresher perspective (though it was written three decades ago) and a lot of things make a lot of sense during a reread. Nevertheless, at that place is a flake of repetition in the book. Also, although he concedes this flaw right away, Scott doesn't direct engage with other theories of ability. Still, this book is worth the fourth dimension.
...more than 
The author's thesis here is pretty much common sense, but it'southward the sort of common sense you ordinarily need pointed out to you. Basically, he's just maxim that relationships between the powerful and the powerless and full of deception. Both groups act a certain way when together, and act completely differently behind-the-scenes. In other words, people under an oppressive government volition talk i way when in the presence of their authorities, and another when they're talking behind the backs of their a The writer's thesis here is pretty much mutual sense, just it's the sort of common sense you usually demand pointed out to you. Basically, he'due south just proverb that relationships betwixt the powerful and the powerless and total of charade. Both groups act a certain manner when together, and deed completely differently behind-the-scenes. In other words, people under an oppressive government will talk one style when in the presence of their authorities, and another when they're talking behind the backs of their authorities. He calls the second sort of discourse a "hidden transcript".The basic idea is pretty obvious. People talk ane manner to their boss, and another style about their dominate. That'due south not a novel proffer. But James Scott applies this to historical readings. We need to remember that we unremarkably get in history is the public transcript, the way people talk openly to and about each other. Nosotros rarely get admission to the hidden transcript, what people say behind the backs of their authorities.
He draws on numerous historical examples to illustrate his point, from eastern peasant populations to slaves in the antebellum south. The only problem for me was that the book wasn't organized by history (what I was more looking for), simply by slightly nuanced points about his overall "hidden transcript" theory. Unfortunately, the nuances were and so slight that the book but comes beyond as repetitive once y'all're into chapter vi or vii.
Overall, though, a great book, and definitely worth the read. His writing is surprisingly practiced, and the historical examples aid a lot. Here i of my favorites, a quote from a post-bellum African-America in the south:
I've joked with white people, in a nice way. I've had to play dumb sometimes--I knowed not to go as well far and let them know what I knowed, because they taken exception of information technology too quick. I had to humble down and play shut-mouthed in many cases to go along, I've done information technology all--they didn't know what it was all about, it'due south only a plain fact....And I could get to 'em a heap of times for a favor and get it....They'd requite you a good name if you was obedient to 'em, acted nice when you met 'em an didn't question 'em 'tour what they said they had against you. You brainstorm to cry almost your rights and the mistreatin' of you and they'd murder you.
...more than A listing of reasons for social phenomenon in the domain of language. Oftentimes quotes slaves as a means to exemplify speech acts of the powerless and references popular movements such equally the English Peasants' Revolt. A list of reasons for social phenomenon in the domain of language. Ofttimes quotes slaves every bit a means to exemplify speech acts of the powerless and references pop movements such as the English Peasants' Revolt. ...more
It does non matter how many times I've read it before, I always find something new in this volume. It is a classic. 1 tin can dash his argument further, of course, but this is 1 of the major works for those interested in resistance, hegemony, and social modify.
Domination and the Arts of Resistance James C Scott in his penetrating test of domination and information technology historic precedents in Domination and the Arts of Resistance published in 1990 has captured my attention for these past days. He carefully examines the ways that the corruption of ability has been more than or less successfully dealt with downwards through the ages. Even though his piece of work seems to reverberate a past era, it appears to me timeless. It also highlights how the overthrow of oppression often ushers in t
Domination and the Arts of Resistance James C Scott in his penetrating test of domination and it historic precedents in Domination and the Arts of Resistance published in 1990 has captured my attention for these past days. He carefully examines the ways that the corruption of ability has been more or less successfully dealt with downward through the ages. Fifty-fifty though his work seems to reflect a by era, it appears to me timeless. It also highlights how the overthrow of oppression oft ushers in the new oppressor, who nether the guise of liberator captures the good will of the newly freed only to erect the new form of oppression. It reminds me of a well-significant friend who heroically attempts to solve a friend'southward problem, but to notice that solving the trouble was non really the effect. Staying the center of attention was actually the consequence of the "friend". While diligently applying talent, fourth dimension and treasure to solve the current trouble, the person needing the attention was but as diligently creating new issues to be solved, sometime even at the expense of hurting for themselves, because the existent issue was their need for attention at any price. Once that was seen, the well-meaning person/citizen withdraws from the futile attempts thereby freeing energy and resources to develop real trouble solving responses. I experience that a close reading of this book might exist a liberating feel today. In these times of jail cell phones, internet, texting and who knows what else volition be bachelor in the future, we, once freed from our illusions of domination might actually see the real needs of our time. "Mother nature" volition have the ultimate say. "She" isn't influenced by the old "they who have the gold make the rules' standard. No corporeality of gold will provide the necessary conditions for my great grandchildren to live humane lives if clean air and water are unavailable. And then I now wearable diaper pins to remind myself that every choice I make they will have to live (or non be able to live) with. I programme to have extras in my pocket to give to those who ask why the pivot. At 82, information technology is my form of resistance so aptly outlined in this penetrating work of James C. Scott. Get your library to find information technology for you. It might provoke a lot of interesting reflections for yous as well.
...more 
In some ways, this is a dated text. Examples are unsystematically presented and literary studies is blended with political science, anthropology, and psychology. Both elements create an statement that requires a little bit of patience and some generosity of reading; both elements also make this a lively, fascinating book that, in addition to its splendid theoretical framework, reads similar a charmer. Scott's Seeing like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed is the In some means, this is a dated text. Examples are unsystematically presented and literary studies is composite with political scientific discipline, anthropology, and psychology. Both elements create an argument that requires a lilliputian bit of patience and some generosity of reading; both elements besides brand this a lively, fascinating book that, in improver to its excellent theoretical framework, reads like a charmer. Scott's Seeing similar a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Take Failed is the virtually frequently cited of his books, but here he makes a strong example in the build-up to that book for understanding discursive and "infra-" politics as objects of written report in their own correct. Drawing on Michel Foucault, Peter Burke, Mikhail Bakhtin, George Eliot and Barrington Moore Jr., amidst many others, Scott builds an argument well-nigh the "public transcripts" that dominate social and political discourse, as well equally about the "hidden transcripts" that occupy the substratum of public discourse. It is really interesting to come across how arguments about cultural politics were framed in the early on nineties, earlier the and so-called civilisation wars, and I'k impressed with the multidisciplinarity of Scott's thinking here. Some of information technology, especially the Bakhtin stuff on carnivals, isn't equally exciting, just overall in that location's a lot hither to remember most specially for political science readers who may find themselves taken ashamed by some of Scott'southward reasoning and arguments.
...more 
Fun volume, though perhaps too much in an interpretive framework. Unlike his other book, "seeing like a state" this book is much less factual since the subject existence discussed is not open up to facts. That is, you tin look at some practice, but you lot cannot know the crusade of the practice, yous tin can only speculate, so credo quite naturally must come up in and play its role. Yet its quite a fun read, it feels like a well written and elaborate conspiracy theory. Fun book, though possibly too much in an interpretive framework. Dissimilar his other volume, "seeing like a country" this book is much less factual since the subject being discussed is non open to facts. That is, you tin can wait at some practice, just yous cannot know the cause of the practise, you can only speculate, so credo quite naturally must come in and play its role. Still its quite a fun read, it feels like a well written and elaborate conspiracy theory. ...more
I of the better and more useful books I'd read recently. Might exist helpful in anthropologising history (especially of from-below, subaltern and related varieties), and in thinking nearly resistance / conformity / power more by and large. Surprising much material from Russia. One of the amend and more useful books I'd read recently. Might exist helpful in anthropologising history (especially of from-below, subaltern and related varieties), and in thinking well-nigh resistance / conformity / power more than generally. Surprising much material from Russian federation. ...more
This is an anthropologist's analysis of what might exist a psychological miracle. Information technology discusses how in situations where there are dominant and subordinate classes of persons, subordinates have to hide their resentment of the inequality. He talks near safety valves, like anonymous private acts of resistance, and finally, how someone has to speak truth to power--someone has to declare out loud what is happening.
I practice not know how this volume fits in with my social club right at present. Definitely the thought
This is an anthropologist's analysis of what might be a psychological phenomenon. It discusses how in situations where in that location are ascendant and subordinate classes of persons, subordinates take to hide their resentment of the inequality. He talks nigh safety valves, similar anonymous individual acts of resistance, and finally, how someone has to speak truth to power--someone has to declare out loud what is happening.
I practise non know how this book fits in with my society right now. Definitely the idea of hidden resentment is something that makes sense in the US in 2016. Do we have a subconscious transcript? That'due south Scott's term for the suppressed narrative of subordinated or oppressed people nearly their ain experience. I'm not sure we accept that anymore in the age of the cyberspace. Await at this quote: "It is only when this hidden transcript is openly declared that subordinates can fully recognize the total extent to which their claims, their dreams, their anger is shared by other subordinates with whom they have not been in direct touch." When we all take a chance to hear each other, and so what happens? Demonstrations, activism, and a groundswell of solidarity from unexpected quarters, I recollect.
On the other hand, doesn't this thought of suppressing what nosotros think come up into play in the workplace pretty much constantly? Political speech can be open up, simply heaven foreclose people should speak against their boss at work and lose their jobs.
...more than 
Spanning the unabridged globe and roofing over 1000 years of human history, James C. Scott'south 'Domination and the Arts of Resistance' is an intellectual odyssey into the relatively new field of subaltern studies. It is too an intellectual oasis for historians and general readers of history who have become disillusioned with the traditional historiography of power relations and resistance amid dominate groups and subordinate groups. Indeed, Scott's use of folklore, speeches, ballads, literary theo Spanning the entire earth and roofing over 1000 years of human history, James C. Scott's 'Domination and the Arts of Resistance' is an intellectual odyssey into the relatively new field of subaltern studies. It is also an intellectual oasis for historians and general readers of history who have go disillusioned with the traditional historiography of power relations and resistance among dominate groups and subordinate groups. Indeed, Scott's use of sociology, speeches, ballads, literary theory,linguistics, and public ceremonies - eastward.g., parades and political rallies - supplements the works of other innovative historians of culture and power relations, eastward.thousand., Scott gives the works of Michel Focault, Hayden White, Dominick LaCapra, and Natalie Zemon Davis, to name a few.
Scott'southward work presents new perspectives for cultural analysis, in spite of certain flaws in his approach - subaltern studies tend to apply modern and post-modern theories that may not fit exactly the group or groups being analyzed. Mayhap of greater importance is Scott's examination of what he describes equally "public" and "private" transcripts,i.east., dialogue among and between the boss and subordinate groups. Furthermore, Scott puts bang-up emphasis on the "infrastructure" of power relationships among the respective inner "communities" of the weak and the strong. In curt, what goes on behind the scenes, away from the public eye, reveals the true nature of what Scott labels as "masks of ability", which are, in consequence, just public performances designed to placate both boss and subordinate groups. This absorbing work will certainly influence future generations of historians, folklorists, anthropologists, political scientists, and sociologists. ...more than
This book divides lodge into essentially two environments; what Scott refers to as the "public transcript," and the "hidden" or "private" transcripts. In the onetime, yous'll find the boulder of the status quo in any society: in monarchies, the public transcript commonly justifies the subjugation of the masses and the social restraint required of them in public. Conversely, the hidden transcript of the resistant masses would include the criticisms, and perhaps the compound anger associated with t This book divides society into essentially two environments; what Scott refers to as the "public transcript," and the "hidden" or "individual" transcripts. In the onetime, yous'll notice the bedrock of the status quo in any society: in monarchies, the public transcript unremarkably justifies the subjugation of the masses and the social restraint required of them in public. Conversely, the hidden transcript of the resistant masses would include the criticisms, and perhaps the compound anger associated with the status quo. I know that quality, scholarly work isn't necessarily earth shattering or completely counter-intuitive; but I accept to say, this book had a heavy bit of "no-duh" associated with it. Social upheaval is essentially the rule in history; the inevitability. Linking this upheaval with the social narrative/cultural assumptions of the repressed classes is a lilliputian obvious.
I would take been more than interested to run across Scott investigate the connection between charisma and the hidden narratives. Unfortunately, it'south an thought he mentions only in passing. Overall, if scholarly (boring) books on sociology are your matter---check this out.
...more 
James Scott makes an first-class analysis of the brandish of power and resistance in everyday gestures, forms of communication and speech through what he calls as the "public transcripts"-the forms, rituals, and discourses through which the dominant group present themselves and their social orders for public view, and the publicly deferential and respectful ways in which subordinate peoples behave and respond when in the presence of ability- and "hidden transcripts"-that refers to what persons say to James Scott makes an excellent analysis of the display of power and resistance in everyday gestures, forms of communication and speech through what he calls as the "public transcripts"-the forms, rituals, and discourses through which the dominant group present themselves and their social orders for public view, and the publicly deferential and respectful ways in which subordinate peoples behave and answer when in the presence of ability- and "hidden transcripts"-that refers to what persons say to each other when they are "off the stage," when they are creating and occupying social spaces (houses, taverns, fairs) that are beyond the gaze and control of powerholders. It is in this areana that we can find the "everyday forms of resistance" that well-nigh scholars fail to meet.
The main problem to his work arises from his idea of two extreme groups - the powerholeders and powerless and his insistence of resistance just when there is a clear-cut case of political consciousness.
Overall, its expert read.
...more
James C. Scott's argument is that interactions betwixt oppressors and the oppressed can exist understood to have 2 (or more) meanings. People say/practice different things when they are in the presence of different people. The public transcript is what people say/do when in public, when "they" are watching. It's what the slave says when the chief is present. It is the dominant discourse. The hidden transcript is what what people say/do when "they" aren't effectually. Information technology's what the slaves say when they're in James C. Scott's argument is that interactions betwixt oppressors and the oppressed can be understood to accept ii (or more) meanings. People say/do dissimilar things when they are in the presence of different people. The public transcript is what people say/do when in public, when "they" are watching. It's what the slave says when the chief is nowadays. It is the dominant discourse. The hidden transcript is what what people say/practice when "they" aren't around. It's what the slaves say when they're in the slave house alone, and the master can't hear. Information technology is the subversive discourse, the discourse of rebellion. This volume helps to clarify the ways in which the oppressed tin and do express themselves, even in the face of the oppressor. The theories in this book are helpful for the savvy interpretation of religious scripture, propaganda, art/architecture/archaeology.
...more than 
Much ameliorate than I expected. When I started reading this, my pre-conceived notion, based on hundreds of papers, talks, articles and dissertations well-nigh resistance was that this would non be very adept. But I was pleasantly surprised nigh how much I enjoyed it and how much the book helped me. Though the book was near actions and words, the concept of hidden transcripts can be applied to the more fabric world. I was actually surprised at how footling the author talked about spaces, though he freq Much better than I expected. When I started reading this, my pre-conceived notion, based on hundreds of papers, talks, manufactures and dissertations almost resistance was that this would not be very good. But I was pleasantly surprised about how much I enjoyed it and how much the book helped me. Though the book was most actions and words, the concept of subconscious transcripts can exist practical to the more textile world. I was really surprised at how little the author talked about spaces, though he frequently eluded to them, in the give-and-take. This, in fact, was my only complaint well-nigh the text. While he discusses, in smashing length, the concept of hidden transcripts and how they are dependent on social spaces, he ignores the actual concrete spaces and their cosmos and importance in this concept. ...more
Scott outlines an attainable and lucid theoretical statement most the subconscious practices of resistance while making a potent statement against those theorists of hegemony and ideology that misperceive the public performances of domination and subordination as evidence of actual and active consent. However, the applicability of Scott'southward ideas to the present context of capitalist democracies suffers somewhat from his concentration on forms of relatively extreme forms of domination in human being history: sl Scott outlines an accessible and lucid theoretical argument near the hidden practices of resistance while making a strong statement confronting those theorists of hegemony and ideology that misperceive the public performances of domination and subordination as evidence of actual and active consent. Notwithstanding, the applicability of Scott'southward ideas to the present context of backer democracies suffers somewhat from his concentration on forms of relatively extreme forms of domination in human history: slavery, serfdom and caste subordination. In addition, he seems to motion rather unproblematically betwixt analyses and claims near micro-level forms of domination and resistance, on the one mitt, and more macro-level phenomena of political rule, on the other, which is non entirely convincing. ...more than
An easy way to create power is to hibernate information and the way to resist is to speak truth to power. In a completely dominated relationship, in that location is no hidden transcript just if there is a subconscious transcript whether it be hidden or out in public but coded in a way that the powerful cannot discern information technology is a challenge to ability. People who resist oppressions are creating the infinite for that potential rebellion. The art of resistance is the many ways subordinates speak the truth of unbalanced relationsh An easy manner to create ability is to hide information and the way to resist is to speak truth to ability. In a completely dominated relationship, there is no hidden transcript but if there is a subconscious transcript whether it be hidden or out in public but coded in a way that the powerful cannot discern it is a claiming to power. People who resist oppressions are creating the space for that potential rebellion. The art of resistance is the many means subordinates speak the truth of unbalanced relationships and this is the battleground of resistance where that resistance is slowly congenital and can offer a spark to a more than organized resistance that can bring revolution. ...more
Dissident subcultures, silenced politics, the myth of false consciousness--if you like Tom Frank and want a social history of the hidden transcripts that atomic number 82 to open revolutions, Prof. Scott might be your man.He covers a lot of the usual sociological suspects (Habermas, Bourdieu, Foucault, Bakhtin, E.P. Thompson), simply he has a light bear on for an academic and draws in all sorts of literary flair (Sophocles, George Eliot, Ralph Ellison, Richard Wright, Balzac, Genet, Kundera, Gombrowicz).
Information technology'southward nic
Dissident subcultures, silenced politics, the myth of imitation consciousness--if you similar Tom Frank and want a social history of the hidden transcripts that pb to open revolutions, Prof. Scott might be your homo.He covers a lot of the usual sociological suspects (Habermas, Bourdieu, Foucault, Bakhtin, E.P. Thompson), simply he has a light touch for an academic and draws in all sorts of literary flair (Sophocles, George Eliot, Ralph Ellison, Richard Wright, Balzac, Genet, Kundera, Gombrowicz).
It's prissy.
...more 
Another splendid work by Scott wherein he really threshes out the issues in defining and researching "resistance". Critical thoughts on whether resistance comes from the individual or the grouping. Its relation to violence. Brechtian theatre and funfair.Should be read with his other work on resistance.
Some other excellent work past Scott wherein he actually threshes out the issues in defining and researching "resistance". Critical thoughts on whether resistance comes from the individual or the grouping. Its relation to violence. Brechtian theatre and carnival.Should be read with his other work on resistance.
...more than 
For anyone trying to sympathise how resistance works when confronted with powerlessness, this is a must read. I have read every book James Scott has written. Though written later in his career, this gives a practiced insight into his methodological approach to Weapons of the Weak and the Moral Economic system of the Peasant.
This is a unique volume where the writer captures a unique trait of human being beings. After having read this volume, one cannot get away by saying that he / she is innocent or was not enlightened of this fact. It definitely challenges you about the question of trusting human beings, as i does tend to await at human being relationships in terms of whether they are dominant or oppressed in nature....
Scott is erudite but not overblown and he freely admits that part of his thesis is nothing new or amazing. Regardless, he argues his indicate well with examples from both history and fine art. I recommend this volume to anyone trying to sympathize the relations between the powerful and the underclass.
Scott explores the relationship public and hidden transcripts that negotiate relationships of dominance. By identifying and unearthing these alternative narratives, he argues for the possibility of reseeding subordinate groups with narrative bureau.
For those looking to learn almost the subtleties betwixt peoples/groups, this volume is invaluable. This volume focuses on the power dynamics between classes and how they interpret with and within their perspective groups.
Oh god, this is going to be and then dry. This is the kind of academic writing that makes me wish academicians had beta readers. But it'southward an interesting topic! Oh god, this is going to be so dry. This is the kind of academic writing that makes me wish academicians had beta readers. Only it's an interesting topic! ...more
Rating this retroactively. 1 of the few books I call up liking from my graduate career. I think I nevertheless take it and may reread it.
It is a worthwhile read, but often a bit dry. It's a lot like reading for a philosophy class. The ideas are inspiring, just are presented in a redundant way. Information technology is a worthwhile read, but oft a bit dry. It's a lot similar reading for a philosophy class. The ideas are inspiring, but are presented in a redundant manner. ...more than
v stars for Chapters ii, 6, and 8; 4 for the rest!
James Scott, Ph.D., Yale University, 1967, is the Sterling Professor of Political Scientific discipline and Professor of Anthropology and is co-Managing director of the Agrestal Studies Program and a mediocre farmer. His research concerns political economic system, comparative agrestal societies, theories of hegemony and resistance, peasant politics, revolution, Southeast Asia, theories of class relations and anarchism.
If you're seeking an first-class audiobook, y'all cannot go wrong with an honour-winning recording. Luckily for us, each year the Audie Awards pick...
"Gossip is peradventure the most familiar and elementary grade of disguised pop aggression. Though its utilize is hardly confined to attacks by subordinates on their superiors, it represents a relatively safe social sanction. Gossip, well-nigh past definition has no identifiable writer, merely scores of eager retailers who tin can claim they are simply passing on the news. Should the gossip—and here I have in mind malicious gossip—exist challenged, anybody tin can disavow responsibility for having originated it. The Malay term for gossip and rumor, khabar angin (news on the wind), captures the diffuse quality of responsibility that makes such assailment possible.
The character of gossip that distinguishes it from rumor is that gossip consists typically of stories that are designated to ruin the reputation of some identifiable person or persons. If the perpetrators remain anonymous, the victim is clearly specified. In that location is, arguably, something of a disguised democratic vox about gossip in the sense that it is propagated but to the extent that others find it in their interest to retell the story.thirteen If they don't, information technology disappears. Above all, about gossip is a soapbox well-nigh social rules that have been violated. A person'south reputation can be damaged by stories almost his tightfistedness, his insulting words, his cheating, or his wearable but if the public amongst whom such tales circulate have shared standards of generosity, polite speech, honesty, and appropriate dress. Without an accustomed normative standard from which degrees of deviation may be estimated, the notion of gossip would make no sense whatever. Gossip, in plough, reinforces these normative standards by invoking them and past teaching anyone who gossips precisely what kinds of carry are likely to exist mocked or despised. 13. The power to gossip is more democratically distributed than ability, property, and income, and, certainly, than the liberty to speak openly. I practice not mean to imply that gossip cannot and is not used by superiors to command subordinates, but that resource on this particular field of struggle are relatively more than favorable to subordinates. Some people's gossip is weightier than that of others, and, providing we do non misfile status with mere public deference, one would wait that those with high personal condition would exist the most effective gossipers."
— 2 likes More quotes…
Welcome dorsum. Just a moment while we sign y'all in to your Goodreads account.
bellsuchadet.blogspot.com
Source: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/20187.Domination_and_the_Arts_of_Resistance
0 Response to "Domination and the Arts of Resistance James Scott Summery"
Post a Comment